The important standard beta coefficient (? = 0

2022年12月16日incontri-con-cani visitors

The important standard beta coefficient (? = 0

The Goal Subscale Epistemology was also a significant predictor of therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Goal subscale (e.g. client and therapist agreement on how to achieve the goals), F(2, 1093) = 4.92, p < .007 (R 2 = .009). 065) for the rationalist epistemology t(1093) = 2.16, p < .031, was in the positive direction. 075) for the constructivist epistemology t(1093) = 2.47, p < .014, was also in the positive direction along the Goal subscale. This was again inconsistent with the proposed hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings towards the Goal subscale in the therapist emphasis on working alliance compared to therapists with a constructivist epistemology.

The Bond Subscale Lastly, epistemology was also a significant predictor of the therapist emphasis on the working alliance along the Bond subscale (the development of a personal bond between the client and therapist), F(2, 1089) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .035). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.034) was in the negative direction, but was not significant, t(1089) = –1.15, p < .249. For the constructivist epistemology, the standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.179) was significant t(1089) = 5.99, p < .0001, and in the positive direction along the Bond subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology is less inclined towards therapist emphasis on working alliance on the Bond subscale than the constructivist epistemology.

Therapists that have a beneficial constructivist epistemology had a tendency to Cane datazione lay even more focus on the private bond regarding healing relationship compared to practitioners which have an excellent rationalist epistemology

The modern research indicated that specialist epistemology try a significant predictor with a minimum of certain aspects of the functional alliance. The best wanting was at regards to the development of a individual bond between your visitors and you will therapist (Thread subscale). Which supporting the idea on books one constructivist practitioners place a heightened increased exposure of strengthening a quality therapeutic matchmaking described as, “greeting, facts, trust, and caring.

Hypothesis step three-the selection of Certain Therapeutic Interventions

The next and final study was created to address new anticipate one epistemology would be an effective predictor off therapist use of certain treatment techniques. More specifically, that rationalist epistemology usually declaration using procedure of intellectual behavioural therapy (age.g. pointers giving) more constructivist epistemologies, and you may therapists that have constructivist epistemologies tend to report playing with techniques of constructivist therapy (e.grams. psychological running) over therapists that have rationalist epistemologies). A simultaneous linear regression studies is actually presented to determine in the event the predictor variable (counselor epistemology) tend to influence counselor analysis of the requirement parameters (treatment processes).

Epistemology was a significant predictor of cognitive behavioral therapy techniques F(2, 993) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .185). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = 0.430) was significant, t(993) = , p < .001 and in the positive direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.057) was significant and in the positive direction t(993) = 1.98, p < .05. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology would have stronger leanings of therapist use of cognitive behavioral techniques when conducting therapy than constructivist epistemologies.

Finally, epistemology was a significant predictor of constructivist therapy techniques F(2, 1012) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .138). The standardized beta coefficient for the rationalist epistemology (? = – 0.297) was significant t(1012) = –, p < .0001 and in the negative direction. The standardized beta coefficient for the constructivist epistemology (? = 0.195) was significant t(1012) = 6.63, p < .0001, and in the positive direction. This supported the hypothesis that the constructivist epistemology would place a stronger emphasis on therapist use of constructivist techniques when conducting therapy than rationalist epistemologies.


发表评论

您的电子邮件对我们很重要。